Friends of Open Space and Vineyards
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Partner Links
  • Support
  • Events
  • News
    • Behind the Barrel
  • Livermore Wineries
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Partner Links
  • Support
  • Events
  • News
    • Behind the Barrel
  • Livermore Wineries
  • Contact

Update on Solar Projects

5/25/2021

 
PicturePhoto from www.savenorthlivermorevalley.com
Aramis
As you may recall from past newsletters, FOV was actively involved in the environmental review and hearing process for the 100 megawatt, 300 acre Aramis Solar Project in North Livermore. The board concluded that the Aramis Project was inappropriately located, violating Measure D and the East County Area Plan, and harming important habitat for threatened species. Analysis of the environmental impact report found it to be deficient as a matter of fact and law. The board also felt strongly that no solar projects should be approved without a comprehensive county solar policy in place. FOV submitted written comments on the environmental impact report, and board members participated in numerous public hearings culminating in the approval of the project by the Board of Zoning Adjustments. FOV was one of three organizations that filed appeals of the decision, and submitted a detailed brief identifying and analyzing the flaws in the findings and conditions. Attorney Stephen Cassidy represented FOV at the appeal hearing and provided a formal presentation to the Board of Supervisors. Unfortunately, the Supervisors voted to uphold the project despite the evidence presented in support of the appeals. 
 
Twenty years ago, FOV was a strong advocate for the passage of Measure D, intended to protect unincorporated East Alameda County from runaway development and to preserve and enhance agriculture and open space. The Supervisors’ approval of the Aramis Project opens the door to further commercialization of North Livermore and represents a major threat to the aims of Measure D. FOV has concluded that we must continue the fight to protect North Livermore.  Consequently we have joined with Save North Livermore Valley and the Ohlone Audubon Society in a lawsuit to challenge the Supervisors’ decision. We believe there are strong legal grounds for overturning the approval, and while we cannot guarantee how the Court will rule, we believe it is important to continue to fight for what we stand for. To support this effort, Save North Livermore Valley has set up a GoFundMe account. All money collected goes to the litigation. To donate, go to https://www.gofundme.com/f/save-north-livermore-valley/
 
Sunwalker
We have good news to share regarding the 6 megawatt, 60 acre Sunwalker Project, also in North Livermore. FOV opposed this project for many of the same reasons we opposed the Aramis Project. In addition, the project would violate the Williamson Act restrictions against covering more than 10% of agricultural land with solar panels and would create cumulative environmental impacts when combined with the Aramis project. The Williamson Act allows landowners to receive reduced property taxes in exchange for keeping their land in productive agriculture. The County staff maintained that the project did not violate the Act. FOV again appealed the Board of Zoning Adjustment’s approval of this project, along with  Save North Livermore Valley and  Friends of Livermore. The Board of Supervisors heard the appeals on April 22. Karen Swaim, a professional biologist, presented on behalf of FOV. The Supervisors had questions about the Williamson Act and other elements of the project and continued the hearing to June 3. On May 19, we were informed that the applicant has withdrawn its application. This is a significant victory.  If we had not continued to fight this project by appealing to the Board of Supervisors and raising the Williamson Act and other issues, this project would have gone forward, further undermining agriculture and open space in North Livermore. If the applicant wants to pursue the project in the future, it will have to file a new application with the county and start the environmental review process all over again. Hopefully, this will not go forward at least until the County adopts a solar policy that specifies the appropriate locations for solar, a process that is currently underway.


Comments are closed.

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    September 2021
    May 2021
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    November 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    September 2018
    August 2017
    May 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.